Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.

81 F. App'x 320
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 385 F.3d 1360
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 29, 2003·No. Nos. 99-1584, 00-1005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the clerk of the Supreme Court in Insituform Technologies, Inc. et al. v. CAT Contracting, Inc., et al., 535 U.S. 1108, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002). The Supreme Court vacated this court in March 26, 2001 judgment in Insituform, and remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002).

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate is recalled and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The case shall be returned for consideration to the original merits panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc., 81 F. App'x 320 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

81 F. App'x 320 (Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related