Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.
This text of 81 F. App'x 320 (Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the clerk of the Supreme Court in Insituform Technologies, Inc. et al. v. CAT Contracting, Inc., et al., 535 U.S. 1108, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002). The Supreme Court vacated this court in March 26, 2001 judgment in Insituform, and remanded for further consideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002).
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The mandate is recalled and the appeal is reinstated.
(2) The case shall be returned for consideration to the original merits panel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/insituform-technologies-inc-v-cat-contracting-inc-cafc-2003.