In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., Debtor. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant

Fifth Circuit

In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., Debtor. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant

700 F.2d 214, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 143, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 419

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1983

Docket83-1048

StatusPublished

Cited by97 cases

This text of 700 F.2d 214 (In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., Debtor. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In the Matter of Braniff Airways, Inc., Debtor. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant, 700 F.2d 214, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 143, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 419 (5th Cir. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code §§ 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision, 1 but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code § 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co.,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the District Court, essentially for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion. We add, in particular, that we conclude that 28 United States Code §§ 1471(a) and (b) were not invalidated by the Marathon decision, 1 but if they were, nevertheless, the jurisdictional grant of 28 United States Code § 1334 remains effective during the transitional period.

AFFIRMED.

1

. The Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipeline Co.,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982).

Roy v. Creasy, Trustee v. Coleman Furniture Corporation, Bank of Virginia Trust Company and Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., and Joe B. Shumate, Jr., T/a Coleman Furniture Company, and Ncnb Financial Services, Inc., Dianne D. Turman v. Joseph B. Shumate, Jr., Roland D. Gunn, Bank of Virginia Trust Company, and Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., N.A., and Roy v. Creasy, Trustee

763 F.2d 656 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)

Bokum Resources Corp. v. Long Island Lighting Co. (In Re Bokum Resources Corp.)

49 B.R. 854 (D. New Mexico, 1985)

Firestone v. Dale Beggs & Associates (In Re Northwest Cinema Corp.)

49 B.R. 479 (D. Minnesota, 1985)

Baker v. Highland (In Re Salem Mortgage Co.)

50 B.R. 34 (E.D. Michigan, 1985)

Fidelity Union Life Insurance v. Lorren (In Re Lorren)

45 B.R. 584 (N.D. Alabama, 1984)

North Central Development Co. v. Landmark Capital Co. (In re Landmark Capital Co.)

742 F.2d 1166 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)

Chosar Corp. v. Owens (In Re Chosar Corp.)

41 B.R. 948 (W.D. Virginia, 1984)

In Re Mark W. Stewart, Debtor. Dorothy Stewart v. Mark W. Stewart

741 F.2d 127 (Seventh Circuit, 1984)

Briney v. Burley

738 F.2d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)

Pine Associates, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

733 F.2d 208 (Second Circuit, 1984)

Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,857 in Re Ernest Davis, Sr.

730 F.2d 176 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 F.2d 214, 8 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 143, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30112, 10 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-braniff-airways-inc-debtor-braniff-airways-inc-v-ca5-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack