In the Matter of Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq.

639 F.2d 492, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21157
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 9, 1981·No. 79-1754·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Upon due consideration, Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq. is hereby suspended indefinitely from practice before this court.

*493 After a reasonable length of time has expired, if Mr. Tranakos can demonstrate to this court that he is knowledgeable regarding the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court, and that he will abide by the orders of this court promptly and diligently, this court will consider lifting the suspension; Provided, That, as to the five (5) cases pending in this court in which he is counsel for the appellants, he may present oral argument and participate in auxiliary matters, such as motions for rehearing, so that his clients in those cases may not be prejudiced.

Further, Mr. Tranakos is assessed as a sanction the sum of five hundred dollars, ($500.00), payable within thirty (30) days from the date hereof to the Clerk of this Court, and he shall not seek reimbursement of that sum from his client herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq., 639 F.2d 492, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 21157 (9th Cir. 1981).

639 F.2d 492 (In the Matter of Arthur P. Tranakos, Esq.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayumi Ito
D. Hawaii, 2022
Castillo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
828 F. Supp. 594 (C.D. Illinois, 1992)
Yagman v. Republic Insurance
137 F.R.D. 310 (C.D. California, 1991)
Stuart Hamblen v. County of Los Angeles
803 F.2d 462 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Matter of Dempsey
632 F. Supp. 908 (N.D. California, 1986)
In re Judicial Misconduct
2 Cl. Ct. 255 (Court of Claims, 1983)