In the Interests of Fatima McC., (Nov. 26, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11499
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedNovember 26, 1997
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11499 (In the Interests of Fatima McC., (Nov. 26, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Interests of Fatima McC., (Nov. 26, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11499 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This case presents a petition for the termination of the parental rights of Stephanie McC. to her three children, Fatima, Danielle and Anthony, ages sixteen, thirteen and nine respectively. The fathers of the two youngest children, Danielle and Anthony, are deceased. The termination of the parental rights of Fatima's putative father, Clinton K., is also sought. These children came into the care of the Department of Children and Families (hereafter the "Department") at various times, beginning in 1993, as their mother was incarcerated and unable to care for them due to her cocaine addiction. Fatima was adjudicated an "uncared for" child and committed to the Department on December 8, 1994 and has had two extensions of her commitment since that time. Danielle was voluntarily placed with the Department by her mother and adjudicated neglected on December 28, 1993. Her commitment has been extended three times. Anthony was also voluntarily placed by his mother and adjudicated an "uncared for" child on June 1, 1995. All three children reside with a maternal cousin, Beverly D., who wishes to adopt them.

The court finds that both the mother and the putative father of Fatima have appeared during the pendency of the case, but not on the date set for the termination trial. Both have court appointed attorneys. The court also finds that each parent had notice of the trial date, father by actual in hand service of a summons and the mother by information provided to her by the Department social worker at the last court hearing as well as by a summons left at her apartment. The court has jurisdiction in this matter; there is no pending action affecting custody of the children in any other court and reasonable efforts have been made to reunify the mother with her children. No such attempts were made for the putative father of Fatima as he has been absent from her life for many years. CT Page 11500

The court, having read the verified petitions, the social studies, the various documents entered into evidence including the report of the court-appointed psychologist, Dr. Freedman, and having heard the testimony of the case worker, makes the following findings by clear and convincing evidence:

Stephanie McC. has been involved with the criminal justice system since 1979, when she reports her cocaine and heroin addiction began. As a result of her addiction, she has had forty-five arrests stemming from charges of robbery, prostitution, criminal impersonation and assault, among others. She received a tenth grade education and has only sporadically been employed. In the near future, she will become thirty-six years old. During her life, she has never been married and has had three children fathered by three different men. Since 1993, she has been incarcerated for over two years and two months, spent eight months in halfway houses and been under intensive supervision for four months. She has received significant services from the Department to assist her in her personal rehabilitation and in reuniting with her children. Those services include in patient drug treatment at the Kendall Morris House, out-patient services and detoxification at Blue Hills Hospital. She was also offered individual and group counseling to deal with the underlying issues which caused her involvement with drugs and the criminal justice system. She received transportation assistance for visitation, placement of the children with her maternal cousin, where she has enjoyed open visitation as well as Department paid telephone calls to the children while incarcerated. In addition, the Department helped her obtain social security disability income and welfare assistance.

In the last year, her contact with her children has been sporadic. While she has visited her children in the past when not incarcerated, she has not seen her children for over one month. The foster mother reports that since Stephanie's release from incarceration in the last month, she has not contacted her children. She has been unable to meet the physical and emotional needs of her children due to her chronic drug addiction and her unavailability to her children. Despite the many and significant services she received, there have been no signs of any rehabilitation by Stephanie. None of the services offered helped her overcome her addiction and she continues to lead a life centered around the use of illegal drugs. CT Page 11501

Clinton K., the father of Fatima, is thirty-four years old and was located by the Department in February of 1997, when he was released after being incarcerated for two years for sale of narcotics. He received an eleventh grade education and has been regularly employed when not incarcerated. Since February of 1997, he has had several telephone conversations with Fatima and met her once at a mall, where he now woks.

Although he was aware of Fatima's existence and her whereabouts, due to information he received from one of Stephanie's relatives, with whom he was incarcerated, until now he never had any contact with Fatima. He has not acknowledged his paternity and his name is not on her birth certificate. He has never contacted the Department about her, sent cards or letters or paid any support for this child.

The fathers of the two youngest children are deceased and their families are not resources for the children.

Of the three children, Danielle, the middle child, has had the most difficult time. She is morbidly obese and has uneven and borderline intellectual function. Dr. Freedman found she was unsure of herself and "at times of stress or insecurity, she obviously turned to compulsive eating as a way to soothe and nurture herself." At school, she is enrolled in special education classes. At home, she does well, is very attached to her foster mother and has positive relationships with her sister and brother.

Fatima, the oldest, is performing adequately in school where she is in the tenth grade. She is also close to her foster mother and her siblings. Dr. Freedman found her "self-assured, to have risen above the problems in her family and to have drawn strength and guidance from those in her life who offered this." Anthony, the youngest, is physically healthy and also enjoys a good relationship with his other siblings. He has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and is taking Ritalin to help him concentrate. He is close to his foster mother and wishes to remain in her home. All three children not only desire to live together, but want to be adopted by Beverly D., who has supplied them with the only reliable and emotionally consistent parenting they have ever known.

ADJUDICATION CT Page 11502

With respect to the statutory grounds for termination of parental rights, the court finds, by clear and convincing evidence that Fatima had been abandoned by Clinton K., her putative biological father, as he has not maintained a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility for his daughter as set forth in Connecticut General Statutes § 17a-112 (c) (3) (A). "A parent must maintain a reasonable degree of interest in the welfare of his or her child. `Maintain' implies a continuing reasonable degree of concern." In Re Michael M.,29 Conn. App. 112, 614 A.2d 832 (1992) quoting In Re Rayna M.,3 Conn. App. 23, 37-38, 534 A.2d 897 (1987).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)
473 A.2d 795 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1983)
Todd v. Malafronte
484 A.2d 463 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1984)
In re Migdalia M.
504 A.2d 533 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)
In re Rayna M.
534 A.2d 897 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1987)
In re Michael M.
614 A.2d 832 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interests-of-fatima-mcc-nov-26-1997-connsuperct-1997.