in the Interest of E.M. and J.M., Children
This text of in the Interest of E.M. and J.M., Children (in the Interest of E.M. and J.M., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14-00313-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF E.M. AND J.M., CHILDREN
From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-001081-CV-85
ORDER
The Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a Motion to Exceed
Word Limit on the Brief of Appellee. The Department requests permission to exceed
the word limit for its responsive brief by 12,126 words. This exceeds the maximum
word limit of 27,000 words allowed for one party for all of its briefs in a proceeding. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B). The Department contends the motion is necessary because
the Department is responding to both appellant mother’s and appellant father’s briefs.
The Department’s motion is granted. We remind the Department that it will not
be able to respond further in this proceeding without prior permission of the Court or
an express order of the Court.
PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion granted Order issued and filed January 22, 2015
In the Interest of E.M. and J.M., Children Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in the Interest of E.M. and J.M., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-interest-of-em-and-jm-children-texapp-2015.