in the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2015
Docket14-14-00515-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy (in the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 141400515CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/13/2015 5:20:15 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

CASE NO. 14-14-00515-CV __________________ FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALSHOUSTON, TEXAS 1/13/2015 5:20:15 PM HOUSTON TEXAS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk ___________________

VALENTINA SPASSOVA SHESHTAWY, Appellant

v.

MICHAEL FUQUA, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ADEL SHESHTAWY, DECEASED, Appellant _________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from Probate Court Number One Harris County, Texas Probate Court Cause No. 407,499-406 _________________________________________________________________

APPELLEE’S AMENDED BRIEF WITH CITATIONS TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK’S RECORD _____________________________________________________________________________

Michael L. Fuqua, Attorney at Law Lead Counsel Fuqua & Associates, P.C. 5005 Riverway, Suite 250 Houston, Texas 77056 (713) 960-0277 - Telephone (713) 960-1064 - Facsimile mlfuqua@fuqualegal.com Attorney for Appellee Michael L. Fuqua, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy, Deceased ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IDENTITY OF PARTIES

Appellant incorrectly identified the Appellee in her Appellant’s Brief as

Michael Fuqua, an attorney with Fuqua & Associates, P.C.

Appellee is Michael Fuqua, in his capacity as Temporary Administrator of

the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy, Deceased; Cause Number 407,499; Probate Court

Number One of Harris County, Texas.

i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Identity of Parties................................................................................................i

Table of Contents..............................................................................................ii

Index of Authorities..........................................................................................iv

Statement of the Case......................................................................................vii

Statement Regarding Oral Argument...............................................................x

Issue Presented.................................................................................................xi

Statement of Facts.............................................................................................1

Base Proceeding .....................................................................................1 Valentina’s Common Law Marriage Suit ..............................................1 Settlement of Common Law Marriage Suit ...........................................2 Temporary Administrator’s Efforts to Sell Property .............................4 Valentina’s Efforts to Set Aside Settlement Agreement and Prevent Sale of Property..................................................................4 Valentina’s Ex Parte Relief ...................................................................5 Trial Court Dismisses Valentina’s Injunction Suit as Baseless Cause of Action ..................................................................6

Summary of the Argument................................................................................7

Trial Court Properly Dismissed Appellant’s Proceeding as Baseless Cause of Action...................................................................7

Argument and Authorities.................................................................................9

I. The trial court properly dismissed Appellant’s proceeding as a baseless cause of action pursuant to TEX.R.CIV.P. 91a..................................................................9

ii Standard of Review .......................................................................9 Valentina did not Preserve Her Issues for Appeal.........................9 Valentina’s Claims Have No Basis in Law...................................10

A. The Settlement Agreement is Enforceable.........................11 Valentina’s Representations and Warranties......................11 Valentina Released All Claims...........................................14 Settlement Agreement Required Sale of Homestead.........15 Valentina Signed the Settlement Agreement......................15 Public Policy Protects Freedom to Contract.......................16 No Allegation of Fraud, Misrepresentation or Deceit........18 Valentina Accepted Consideration and Cannot Rescind the Contract...........................................................18 Valentina Waived Homestead Rights.................................19

B. Valentina’s Purported Homestead Rights..........................21 Hanya, Nader and Lily are Adel’s Sole Heirs....................21

C. Lily’s Homestead Rights....................................................22 Trial Court’s Authority to Appoint Lily’s Attorney ad Litem....................................................22

Prayer................................................................................................................24

Certificate of Service........................................................................................25

Certificate of Compliance. ..............................................................................26

Appellee’s Restated Appendix with Citations to Second Supplemental Clerk’s Record.............................................................27

iii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

American Mannex Corp. v. Huffstutler, 328 F.2d 449, 455 (5th Cir. 1964)............................................................................18

Amouri v. Sw. Toyota, Inc., 20 S.W.3d 165, 169 n.2 (Tex.App. – Texarkana 2000, pet. denied)..............................................................17

ASI Tech., Inc. v. Johnson Equip. Co., 75 S.W.3d 545, 548 (Tex.App. – San Antonio 2002, pet. denied)........................................16-17, 20

Austin Bridge Company, et al. v. State of Texas, 427 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.App. – Austin 1968, writ ref’d n.r.e. ).................................17

Brown v. Aztec Rig Equip., Inc., 921 S.W.2d 835, 8436 (Tex.App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied)........................................17, 19

Crutchfield v. Associates Investment Company, 376 S.W.2d 957, 959 (Tex.App. – Dallas 1964, writ ref’d.)...................................17

De Ayla v. Mackie, 193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006)............................................21

Ferguson v. Ferguson, 111 S.W.3d 589, 598 (Tex.App. – Fort Worth, 2003, pet. denied)............................................................20

Guerrero v. Hagco Building Systems, Inc., 733 S.W.2d 635, 638 (Tex.App. – San Antonio 1987, no writ).................................................................18

Hunter v. Clark, 687 S.W.2d 811, 815 (Tex.App.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amouri v. Southwest Toyota, Inc.
20 S.W.3d 165 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Litoff v. Jackson
742 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Hunter v. Clark
687 S.W.2d 811 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Smith v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
433 S.W.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
In Re McKinney
167 S.W.3d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)
De Ayala v. MacKie
193 S.W.3d 575 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
Brown v. Aztec Rig Equipment, Inc.
921 S.W.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ferguson v. Ferguson
111 S.W.3d 589 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc.
44 S.W.3d 544 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)
In Re Bunzl USA, Inc.
155 S.W.3d 202 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
ASI Technologies, Inc. v. Johnson Equipment Co.
75 S.W.3d 545 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
North East Independent School District v. Aldridge
400 S.W.2d 893 (Texas Supreme Court, 1966)
Mandell and Wright v. Thomas
441 S.W.2d 841 (Texas Supreme Court, 1969)
Parr v. White
543 S.W.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Crutchfield v. Associates Investment Company
376 S.W.2d 957 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Austin Bridge Company v. State
427 S.W.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
Guerrero v. Hagco Building Systems, Inc.
733 S.W.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Williams v. Williams
569 S.W.2d 867 (Texas Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in the Estate of Adel Sheshtawy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-adel-sheshtawy-texapp-2015.