in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr.

DecidedMarch 15, 2018

Docket11-16-00115-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr. (in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

In the Estate of Richard E. * From the 39th District Court Mathis, Jr., deceased, of Haskell County, Trial Court No. 12,103

No. 11-16-00115-CV * March 15, 2018

* Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed insofar as it dismissed Michael Mathis’s claims. The judgment of the trial court is reversed with respect to the trial court’s non-award of attorney’s fees, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of Richard V. Mathis and Betty Mathis’s attorney’s fees consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Michael Mathis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

In the Estate of Richard E. * From the 39th District Court Mathis, Jr., deceased, of Haskell County, Trial Court No. 12,103

No. 11-16-00115-CV * March 15, 2018

* Opinion by Bailey, J. (Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting by assignment)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed insofar as it dismissed Michael Mathis’s claims. The judgment of the trial court is reversed with respect to the trial court’s non-award of attorney’s fees, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of Richard V. Mathis and Betty Mathis’s attorney’s fees consistent with this opinion. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Michael Mathis.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in the Estate of Richard E. Mathis, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-estate-of-richard-e-mathis-jr-texapp-2018.