in Re: Yanika Daniels
This text of in Re: Yanika Daniels (in Re: Yanika Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 19, 2021
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00599-CV
IN RE YANIKA DANIELS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-52923-2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Reichek Opinion by Justice Molberg Relator’s July 16, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial
court’s order issuing a writ of habeas corpus directing her to produce the child for a
hearing. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based
on our review of the petition and record, relator has failed to show her entitlement
to the relief requested. We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Having denied the petition, we deny the July 19, 2021 emergency motion for
stay as moot.
/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Yanika Daniels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-yanika-daniels-texapp-2021.