in Re: Yanika Daniels
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed November 19, 2018.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01302-CV
IN RE YANIKA DANIELS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-012682
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to
vacate its November 21, 2016 modification order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must
show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate
appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to
the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to
the relief sought).
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 181302F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Yanika Daniels (in Re: Yanika Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.