in Re: Yanika Daniels

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 2018·No. 05-18-01302-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed November 19, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01302-CV

IN RE YANIKA DANIELS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-012682

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to

vacate its November 21, 2016 modification order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must

show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate

appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to

the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to

the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE 181302F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Yanika Daniels, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

in Re: Yanika Daniels (in Re: Yanika Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)