in Re: Yanika Daniels
Opinion
Denied and Opinion issued December 31, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-01099-CV
IN RE YANIKA DANIELS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-52923-2021
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Myers
Before the court are relator’s December 28, 2021 amended petition for writ
of mandamus and amended emergency motion for temporary relief. Relator’s
petition challenges the trial court’s entry of a modification order in the underlying
suit affecting parent child relations as well as the trial court’s failure to hear
various motions relator filed.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
1 Based on our review of the petition and record, we conclude relator has
failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny
the amended petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
We deny relator’s amended emergency motion for temporary relief as moot.
211099f.p05 /Lana Myers// LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Yanika Daniels (in Re: Yanika Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.