In re Woodmansee

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Woodmansee

255 A.2d 667, 127 Vt. 575, 1969 Vt. LEXIS 280

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided June 17, 1969·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a direct application to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus and for release on bail pending review of a judgment of conviction for the crime of forgery. The offense is not bailable as a matter of right, at this stage of the proceedings, within the meaning of Section 32 of Chapter II of the Vermont Constitution. In re Woodmansee, 124 Vt. 219, 220, 202 A.2d 267; In re Comolli, 78 Vt. 337, 343, 63 A. 184. Furthermore, this Court is without authority to entertain the application on the facts alleged in the petition. In re Ovitt, 126 Vt. 298, 299, 229 A.2d 243; In re Mason, 126 Vt. 122, 123, 223 A.2d 477.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a direct application to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus and for release on bail pending review of a judgment of conviction for the crime of forgery. The offense is not bailable as a matter of right, at this stage of the proceedings, within the meaning of Section 32 of Chapter II of the Vermont Constitution. In re Woodmansee, 124 Vt. 219, 220, 202 A.2d 267; In re Comolli, 78 Vt. 337, 343, 63 A. 184. Furthermore, this Court is without authority to entertain the application on the facts alleged in the petition. In re Ovitt, 126 Vt. 298, 299, 229 A.2d 243; In re Mason, 126 Vt. 122, 123, 223 A.2d 477.

Petition dismissed.

In re Woodmansee, 255 A.2d 667, 127 Vt. 575, 1969 Vt. LEXIS 280 (Vt. 1969).

Pincite

255 A.2d 667 (In re Woodmansee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related