In Re Ovitt

229 A.2d 243, 126 Vt. 298, 1967 Vt. LEXIS 188
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided April 4, 1967·No. 494·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While the appeal in State of Vermont v. Herbert E. Ovitt, No. 491, was pending, the respondent appellant presented a motion to vacate his sentence. The motion was brought under the provisions of 13 V.S.A. §7131 (1966, No. 41 §la). It attacks the validity of the information, claiming the Deputy Attorney General was without lawful authority to institute the prosecution. This point is considered in the appeal from his conviction.

The Essex County Court denied the motion because of the pending appeal, ruling that all of the issues presented were avail *299 able on direct review by this Court. The statute, upon which the petitioner acted, cannot do service as an appeal. The order dismissing the petition is well founded. In re Rickert, 124 Vt. 232, 235, 203 A.2d 602.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Ovitt, 229 A.2d 243, 126 Vt. 298, 1967 Vt. LEXIS 188 (Vt. 1967).

229 A.2d 243 (In Re Ovitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berard v. Moeykens
326 A.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)
In re Woodmansee
255 A.2d 667 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1969)