In Re Woodmansee

202 A.2d 267, 124 Vt. 219, 1964 Vt. LEXIS 88
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided June 15, 1964·No. 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*220 Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Bernard Woodmansee, seeks release from the Vermont State Prison at Windsor by habeas corpus. It appears from the petition that the prisoner’s confinement was ordered by a mittimus, issued by the Chittenden County Court upon his conviction and sentence after trial by jury for the offenses of burglary and attempted arson. He contends he is entitled to be admitted to bail pending final disposition of his appeal from these convictions.

Since it appears that the petitioner is “in execution” within the meaning of Section 32, Chapter II of the Vermont Constitution, the offense for which he is confined is not bailable, as a matter of right, at this stage of the proceedings. In re Comolli, 78 Vt. 337, 343, 63 Atl. 184. This disposition is also in accord with the unreported case In re Rickert, No. 1984, filed June 4, 1964.

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Woodmansee, 202 A.2d 267, 124 Vt. 219, 1964 Vt. LEXIS 88 (Vt. 1964).

202 A.2d 267 (In Re Woodmansee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Woodmansee
326 A.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)
In re Woodmansee
255 A.2d 667 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1969)