In Re: Williams v.

23 F. App'x 178
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2002·No. 01-7485·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Williams petitions this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the district court to rule on his pending petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), which he filed on March 12, 2001. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Williams’ petition does not set forth exceptional circumstances as would warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus at this time. We note, however, that no significant action has been taken in the district court for over seven months.

Accordingly, we deny Williams’ petition without prejudice to his refiling it should the district court fail to act within a reasonable time. We grant Williams’ application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Williams v., 23 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2002).

23 F. App'x 178 (In Re: Williams v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)