In re: Williams v.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2000·No. 00-7156·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7156

In Re: JIMMY LEE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-96-41-F, CA-99-58-F)

Submitted: September 14, 2000 Decided: September 21, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Lee Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Lee Williams petitions this court for a writ of mandamus

directing the district court to act upon his motion filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). The district court

entered a final order on August 29, 2000, denying relief on

Williams’ motion. Therefore, the petition for mandamus is moot.

Accordingly, while we grant Williams leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we dismiss the mandamus petition without prejudice. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Williams v., (4th Cir. 2000).

In re: Williams v. (In re: Williams v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related