In Re: Williams v.
This text of In Re: Williams v. (In Re: Williams v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7344
In Re: MICHAEL ANTWON WILLIAMS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-231-H)
Submitted: March 5, 2004 Decided: March 25, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Antwon Williams, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Antwon Williams brought this mandamus action
seeking to compel the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina to issue a temporary restraining order
and a preliminary injunction against several defendants Williams
named in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. Williams has failed
to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to
mandamus relief and that there are no other adequate means for
obtaining the relief sought. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,
449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Williams v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-williams-v-ca4-2004.