In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley
This text of 808 F.2d 1373 (In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
808 F.2d 1373
In re WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM SECURITIES LITIGATION.
Henry PUCHALL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HOUGHTON, CLUCK, COUGHLIN & RILEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-3594.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 29, 1987.
Paul M. Bernstein, Melvyn I. Weiss, New York City, James R. Irwin, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Herbert M. Wachtell, New York City, Camden M. Hall, John L. Mericle, Seattle, Wash., Daniel R. Murdock, New York City, Peter R. Mersereau, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
808 F.2d 1373, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-washington-public-power-supply-system-securities-litigation-henry-ca9-1987.