In re Vetco, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Vetco, Inc.

260 A.D.2d 642, 687 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 642 (In re Vetco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Vetco, Inc., 260 A.D.2d 642, 687 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a seeking, inter alia, the dissolution of the respondent corporation, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated May 14, 1998, as determined that the valuation date of the corporation and its shares is the day prior to the date on which the instant petition was filed.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly adhered to Business Corporation Law § 1118 (b) in determining the valuation date of his shares. Business Corporation Law § 1118 (b) states that a court may, inter alia, “determine the fair value of the petitioner’s shares as of the [643]*643day prior to the date on which such petition was filed” (see also, Matter of Pace Photographers, 71 NY2d 737, 746; see also, Matter of Taines v Barry One Hour Photo Process, 123 Misc 2d 529, affd 108 AD2d 630). Ritter, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a seeking, inter alia, the dissolution of the respondent corporation, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated May 14, 1998, as determined that the valuation date of the corporation and its shares is the day prior to the date on which the instant petition was filed.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly adhered to Business Corporation Law § 1118 (b) in determining the valuation date of his shares. Business Corporation Law § 1118 (b) states that a court may, inter alia, “determine the fair value of the petitioner’s shares as of the [643]*643day prior to the date on which such petition was filed” (see also, Matter of Pace Photographers, 71 NY2d 737, 746; see also, Matter of Taines v Barry One Hour Photo Process, 123 Misc 2d 529, affd 108 AD2d 630). Ritter, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 642, 687 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-vetco-inc-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack