Weingarten v. Thirty-First Street Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weingarten v. Thirty-First Street Realty Corp.

68 A.D.3d 1009, 890 N.Y.2d 325

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1009 (Weingarten v. Thirty-First Street Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weingarten v. Thirty-First Street Realty Corp., 68 A.D.3d 1009, 890 N.Y.2d 325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

[1010]*1010Under the circumstances presented here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the motion of the appellant, Fred Weingarten, made jointly with the estate of Jacob Popovic, which was pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118, inter alia, for leave to elect to purchase the shares representing the petitioner’s minority interest in Thirty-First Street Realty Corporation (hereinafter the corporation), where the motion was made more than 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition (see Business Corporation Law § 1118 [a]; see e.g. Matter of Vetco, Inc., 260 AD2d 642 [1999]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1010]*1010Under the circumstances presented here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the motion of the appellant, Fred Weingarten, made jointly with the estate of Jacob Popovic, which was pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118, inter alia, for leave to elect to purchase the shares representing the petitioner’s minority interest in Thirty-First Street Realty Corporation (hereinafter the corporation), where the motion was made more than 90 days after the date of the filing of the petition (see Business Corporation Law § 1118 [a]; see e.g. Matter of Vetco, Inc., 260 AD2d 642 [1999]). Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.3d 1009, 890 N.Y.2d 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weingarten-v-thirty-first-street-realty-corp-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack