In Re United Kitchen Associates, Inc.

33 B.R. 214, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5596, 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 83
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana
DecidedAugust 17, 1983
Docket19-80011
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 33 B.R. 214 (In Re United Kitchen Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re United Kitchen Associates, Inc., 33 B.R. 214, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5596, 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 83 (La. 1983).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT

LeROY SMALLENBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issues at question are, first, may fifteen employees with claims in excess of *215 $5,000.00 put an employer into involuntary bankruptcy, and second, is the entity in question an eleemosynary corporation, and therefore exempt from involuntary bankruptcy?

On April 22, 1983, fifteen employees of United Kitchen Associates, Inc., debtor corporation, filed a petition to put debtor corporation into involuntary bankruptcy. The claims of these employees are past due wages, and the claims aggregate to $19,-504.87.

These petitioning creditors claimed in their petition that United Kitchen Associates, Inc. was a Louisiana non-profit corporation. Now those petitioning creditors disclaim that United Kitchen Associates, Inc., is a non-profit corporation.

These petitioning creditors set forth two principal reasons why they believe that debtor corporation should not be classified as an eleemosynary corporation. First, these creditors allege that the debtor corporation has not filed an exemption number for status as a non-profit corporation with the Internal Revenue Service. Second, these creditors claim that United Kitchen Associates, Inc., has only received contributions from the Council of the Aging in six different parishes, and not from the general public.

United Kitchen’s articles of incorporation, dated June 10,1980, state that the corporation was incorporated as a non-profit corporation. The stated purpose in the articles is to provide meals to the elderly. The corporation was organized on a nonstock basis with only issuances of membership allowed for a $5.00 fee to each member. An issuance of membership entitled the member to vote at general membership meetings. The articles state that none of the profits of the corporation, if any, shall ever be disbursed to a holder of a membership certificate.

An audit report of the debtor corporation by James Orr, certified public accountant, showed that the accounts payable by the debtor corporation exceed the cash and accounts receivable of the debtor corporation by more than $14,000, on June 20,1982. There were no formal books of accounting produced for periods subsequent to June 30, 1982, because debtor corporation claimed none could be located. The bank statements for the period August 1, 1982, through March 31, 1983, showed deposits exceeded disbursements by $1,960.35 for the eight month period.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Issue No. 1: May Fifteen Employees with Claims in Excess of $5,000.00 Put an Employer into Involuntary Bankruptcy?

Under 11 U.S.C. 303(b)(1) a debtor may be put into involuntary bankruptcy through petition by three or more entities with non-contingent claims that aggregate to at least $5,000.00 more than the value of any lien on property of debtor if there are 12 or more creditors.

Under 11 U.S.C. 303(b)(2) one or more creditors may file a petition for involuntary bankruptcy if such claim or claims aggregate to at least $5,000.00 and there are fewer than 12 such holders, excluding an employee or insider of such person and any transferee of a voidable transfer under 11 U.S.C. 544, 545, 548, 549, or 724(a).

Under the plain meaning of 11 U.S.C. 303(b)(1) and (2) employees of the debtor may be petitioning creditors for involuntary bankruptcy of the debtor. Employees are only excluded when determining if the debtor has twelve or more “non-friendly” creditors. This exclusion does not apply when the employees desire to become petitioning creditors. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 303.08[6] (15th ed. 1983).

Therefore, fifteen employees with aggregate claims of $19,504.87 may file a petition to put a non-exempt debtor into involuntary bankruptcy.

Issue No. 2: Is United Kitchen Associates an Eleemosynary Corporation, and Therefore Exempt From Involuntary Bankruptcy?

Under 11 U.S.C. 303(a) an involuntary case in bankruptcy may not be commenced against a “corporation” that is not *216 a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation. Such eleemosynary institutions as churches, schools, and charitable organizations and foundations are, thus exempt from involuntary bankruptcy. H.Rept. No. 95-595, p. 322, Bkr-L Ed, Legislative History Section 82:16.

The exemption granted these institutions is a continuation of earlier bankruptcy law. The pertinent provisions of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 were phrased somewhat differently. Section 4 thereof (former 11 U.S.C.S. Section 22) stated that, “... any moneyed, business, or commercial corporation ... may be adjudged an involuntary bankrupt... ”. Hence, it was by judicial interpretation that eligibility for involuntary bankruptcy was limited to corporations organized for profit, and that charitable or educational institutions were excluded, at least unless transactions indicated otherwise.

9 Am.Jur.2d, Bankruptcy Section 227.

The bankruptcy courts have not been consistent in their results. In the case of In re Elmsford Country Club (1931, DC NY) 50 F.2d 238, the court found a country club not to be subject to involuntary bankruptcy. In the case of In re Allen University (1974, CA4 SC) 497 F.2d 346, a university was found to be exempt, even though it carried on a number of commercial activities. In the case of In re Weeks Poultry Community, Inc., (1931, DC Cal) 51 F.2d 122, a corporation organized on a co-operative basis for the purpose of packing and marketing agricultural products for members and others to facilitate profitable marketing, was held not to be a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation. In the case of In re Dairy Marketing Assn. (1925, DC Ind) 8 F.2d 626, a dairy marketing association was held not to be a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation. However, in the case of In re American Grain and Cattle, Inc., (1976, ND Tex) 415 F.Supp. 270, 2 B.C.D. 823, the court found that co-operative associations were within the intendment of former 11 U.S.C. 22(b), and the court has jurisdiction over the bankrupt.

The disparity in results seem to flow from a conflict among the courts as to whether the “state classification rule” should apply, or the “bankrupt rule”.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Corrline International, LLC
516 B.R. 106 (S.D. Texas, 2014)
In re DemirCo Group (North America), L.L.C.
343 B.R. 898 (C.D. Illinois, 2006)
In re Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
337 B.R. 388 (D. New Mexico, 2005)
In Re Capitol Hill Healthcare Group
242 B.R. 199 (District of Columbia, 1999)
In Re Caucus Distributors, Inc.
83 B.R. 921 (E.D. Virginia, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 B.R. 214, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5596, 11 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-united-kitchen-associates-inc-lawb-1983.