In Re TXU Electric Co.
This text of 67 S.W.3d 130 (In Re TXU Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this original proceeding, relator is TXU Electric Co. and respondents are the Public Utility Commission and its three members. TXU seeks relief from portions of the Commission’s orders requiring TXU to reverse efforts it has undertaken to mitigate its estimated stranded costs as part of the transition to a deregulated, competitive retail market for the sale of electricity in Texas.
Six Membees of the Court vote to deny relief for different reasons. Chief Justice Phillips, joined by Justice Enoch and Justice Godbey, would not exercise mandamus jurisdiction because TXU has an adequate remedy at law. Justice BakeR, joined by Justice RodRiguez, would hold that the relief TXU seeks is against the Commission, over which the Court has no original mandamus jurisdiction. Justice BristeR would hold that the portions of the Commission’s orders of which TXU complains do not constitute a clear abuse of discretion. Justice Hecht, joined by Justice Owen and Justice Jefferson, would grant relief.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.W.3d 130, 45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 268, 2001 Tex. LEXIS 133, 2001 WL 1668188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-txu-electric-co-tex-2001.