In re the Minnesota & Wisconsin Railroad

78 N.W. 753, 103 Wis. 191, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 143
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided May 16, 1899·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Tbe following opinion was filed April 4, 1899:

Hodge, J.

Tbe court has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from this order. Such jurisdiction cannot exist under-any of tbe subdivisions of sec. 3069, Stats. 1898,— not under subd. 1, because it does not in effect determine the action,, nor prevent a judgment from which an appeal can be taken nor under subd. 2, for tbe reason that it is not a final order, though made in a special proceeding. Subds. 3 and 4, of' course, have no application.

While both parties consent to and urge consideration of tbe merits of tbe order on this appeal, tbe court is precluded from acceding to such request by l^,ck of jurisdiction, which [192]*192cannot be conferred by consent of parties. Hyde v. German Nat. Bank, 96 Wis. 406, 410.

By the Oom±— The appeal is dismissed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied May 16, 1899.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Minnesota & Wisconsin Railroad, 78 N.W. 753, 103 Wis. 191, 1899 Wisc. LEXIS 143 (Wis. 1899).

78 N.W. 753 (In re the Minnesota & Wisconsin Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.
235 N.W. 426 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1931)
Gilbert v. Hoard
230 N.W. 720 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
Ketchum Coal Co. v. Pleasant Valley Coal Co.
168 P. 86 (Utah Supreme Court, 1917)
Wisconsin Real Estate Co. v. City of Milwaukee
138 N.W. 642 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
Sioux Land Co. v. Ewing
135 N.W. 130 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
Seattle & Northern Railway Co. v. Bowman
89 P. 399 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Flannigan v. Lindgren
100 N.W. 818 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1904)
Allen v. Boberg
84 N.W. 421 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)