Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.

235 N.W. 426, 205 Wis. 349, 1931 Wisc. LEXIS 1
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 13, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 235 N.W. 426 (Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manns v. Marinette & Menominee Paper Co., 235 N.W. 426, 205 Wis. 349, 1931 Wisc. LEXIS 1 (Wis. 1931).

Opinions

The following opinion was filed March 10, 1931:

Fairchild, J.

Where no statute authorizes an appeal to this court there can be no appeal. Puffer v. Welch, 141 Wis. 304, 124 N. W. 406; Wildes v. Franke, 157 Wis. 189, 146 N. W. 1119. The purpose of this rule of practice is to serve public interest in a speedy end to litigation. Ap[351]*351peals from orders not affecting substantial rights usually accomplish only delays. In condemnation proceedings the only appeal referred to in any of the sections in ch. 32 is in sec. 32.11, — “any party to a condemnation'proceeding . . . may appeal from the award of the commissioners to the circuit court of the county, ...” And it is further provided that the appeal shall be treated as an action pending in the court with the owners of the property as plaintiffs and the party by whom the property is taken as defendant. The proceedings thereafter are those of an action in said court subject to all the provisions of law relating to actions originally brought therein. This means that there is a trial de novo before the court and jury and any and all issues that can be properly framed or asserted may be examined and decisions made thereon. And this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from this order under sec. 274.33, Stats. As was said in In re Minnesota & Wisconsin R. Co. 103 Wis. 191, 79 N. W. 753: “Such jurisdiction cannot exist under any of the subdivisions of sec. 3069, Statutes of 1898 (now sec. 274.33),-not under sub. (1), because it does not in effect determine the action, nor prevent a judgment from which an appeal can. be taken; nor under sub. (2), for the reason that it is not a final order.” The other provisions of sec. 274.33 have no application.

By the Court. — The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schoenhofen v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
605 N.W.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1999)
Arp v. State Highway Commission
567 P.2d 736 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1977)
Revival Center Tabernacle of Battle Creek v. City of Milwaukee
227 N.W.2d 694 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1975)
Iroquois Gas Corp. v. Jurek
30 A.D.2d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Commission
145 N.W.2d 217 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1966)
Kultgen v. Mueller
88 N.W.2d 687 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1958)
City of Madison v. Tiedeman
83 N.W.2d 694 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1957)
Barrows v. Kenosha County
81 N.W.2d 519 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1957)
Klump v. Cybulski
81 N.W.2d 42 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1957)
State Ex Rel. Wisconsin State Department of Agriculture v. Aarons
22 N.W.2d 160 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1946)
Olen v. Waupaca County
300 N.W. 178 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)
Fronhaefer v. Richter
296 N.W. 588 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)
Baker v. Onsrud
278 N.W. 870 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1938)
People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State Bank
197 N.E. 537 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1935)
Delpo Corp. v. Northern States Power Co.
254 N.W. 553 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1934)
Pennefeather v. City of Kenosha
247 N.W. 440 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1933)
Tobin v. Willow River Power Co.
242 N.W. 480 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 N.W. 426, 205 Wis. 349, 1931 Wisc. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manns-v-marinette-menominee-paper-co-wis-1931.