In re the Estate of O'Brien

147 Misc. 362, 265 N.Y.S. 37, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Estate of O'Brien. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 Misc. 555
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided March 22, 1933·Published

Opinion

Delehanty, S.

This is an application by the father of the above-named intestate to revoke letters of administration heretofore issued by this court to Ernest Deas upon a petition wherein the latter represented himself as husband of the intestate. Sufficient proof was presented by the respondent to establish the fact of marriage between him and the deceased. The only item of evidence tending in any degree to negative the fact of marriage was the continued use by the intestate of the name O’Brien in the receipt of compensation payments arising out of the death of her first husband. This fact does not overbear the' substantial proof that the intestate and the respondent lived together under such circumstances as create a presumption that they were married (Gall v. Gall, 114 N. Y. 109, at p. 117; Hynes v. McDermott, 91 id. 451; Matter of Erlanger, 145 Misc. 1.)

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Estate of O'Brien, 147 Misc. 362, 265 N.Y.S. 37, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1933).

147 Misc. 362 (In re the Estate of O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gall v. . Gall
21 N.E. 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
In re the Estate of Erlanger
145 Misc. 1 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)