In Re the Estate of Matejek

960 S.W.2d 650, 1997 WL 381357
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1997·No. 96-1191·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In denying this application, the Court disapproves the court of appeals’ analysis to the extent that it requires a party seeking summary judgment on a limitations defense to negate the discovery rule when the non-mov-ant has not pleaded or otherwise raised the discovery rule. Woods v. William, M. Mercer, Inc., 769 S.W.2d 515, 518 (Tex.1989). We deny Matejek’s application for writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Estate of Matejek, 960 S.W.2d 650, 1997 WL 381357 (Tex. 1997).

960 S.W.2d 650 (In Re the Estate of Matejek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melba James v. Anchor Boatlifts LLC and Jason Miller
Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont), 2026
Rodney Draughon v. Joycie Johnson
Texas Supreme Court, 2021
Tom Tucker v. Carl Bedgood and Laura Bedgood
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016
Robert Phalen v. Wayne Kirk
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Ravi Botla, M.D. v. Salvador Del Toro, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
James Ray Blake v. Jesse L. Nickerson, III
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007
Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co.
211 S.W.3d 310 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
In Re the Estate of McGarr
10 S.W.3d 373 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Honea v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.
997 S.W.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)