In re the Estate of Folsom
This text of 160 N.E.2d 857 (In re the Estate of Folsom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[889]*889In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion.
Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke. Chief Judge Conway and Judge Froessel dissent and vote to modify by striking from the third decretal paragraph of the Surrogate’s decree the words “but have no effect” and substituting therefor the word ‘ ‘ and ’ ’, and, as so modified, vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 N.E.2d 857, 6 N.Y.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-estate-of-folsom-ny-1959.