Home/Washington Supreme Court/In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Moynihan

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Moynihan

643 P.2d 439, 97 Wash. 2d 237, 1982 Wash. LEXIS 1306
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 8, 1982
DocketC.D. 8227
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 643 P.2d 439 (In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Moynihan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Moynihan, 643 P.2d 439, 97 Wash. 2d 237, 1982 Wash. LEXIS 1306 (Wash. 1982).

Opinions

Brachtenbach, C.J.

The Bar Association filed a complaint against Joseph T. Moynihan, charging three counts of neglect of legal matters entrusted to him, one count of failure to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation and violation of rules governing trust accounts.

The hearing panel officer found neglect of one matter, failure to cooperate and misappropriation of trust funds. This conduct violates the Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 (A) (3), Discipline Rules for Attorneys 2.6 and CPR DR 9-102 respectively. The hearing panel officer recommended disbarment. The Disciplinary Board adopted the hearing panel officer's findings, conclusions and recommendation.

The findings of fact have not been objected to by respondent attorney. Those facts reveal that over an extended period of time, respondent appropriated trust funds for his personal use. There were repeated violations, e.g., withdrawal of $1,250 on October 20, 1978, then $1,400 was taken in December 1978, by writing three checks on two occasions. There is no doubt of the intentional nature of respondent's acts. He deposited personal funds to cover his misappropriations, but subsequently took trust funds again.

Respondent urges that we impose discipline other than disbarment. The only mitigating factors suggested are lack of prior misconduct and no ultimate loss to clients.

These so-called mitigating factors are not sufficient to prevent disbarment. Once again we emphasize that the rules governing trust account funds mean what they say. Lawyers must preserve the integrity of entrusted funds. Their failure to do so leads to disbarment absent extraordinary mitigating circumstances. In re Deschane, 84 Wn.2d [239]*239514, 516, 527 P.2d 683 (1974).

Neglect of a legal matter and failure to cooperate justify discipline but the repeated misappropriation of trust funds fully justifies disbarment and we so hold. Costs of $349.98 are awarded.

Joseph T. Moynihan is hereby disbarred, and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys in this state.

Stafford, Utter, Dolliver, Dore, Dimmick, and Pearson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Schwimmer
108 P.3d 761 (Washington Supreme Court, 2005)
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Schwimmer
153 Wash. 2d 752 (Washington Supreme Court, 2005)
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Tasker
9 P.3d 822 (Washington Supreme Court, 2000)
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Tasker
9 P.3d 822 (Washington Supreme Court, 2000)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Johnson
790 P.2d 1227 (Washington Supreme Court, 1990)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Rentel
729 P.2d 615 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Selden
728 P.2d 1036 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Malone
728 P.2d 1029 (Washington Supreme Court, 1986)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Vetter
711 P.2d 284 (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stock
704 P.2d 611 (Washington Supreme Court, 1985)
Disciplinary Proceeding v. Noble
667 P.2d 608 (Washington Supreme Court, 1983)
In Re Noble
667 P.2d 608 (Washington Supreme Court, 1983)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Sawyer
656 P.2d 503 (Washington Supreme Court, 1983)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Moynihan
643 P.2d 439 (Washington Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 P.2d 439, 97 Wash. 2d 237, 1982 Wash. LEXIS 1306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-disciplinary-proceeding-against-moynihan-wash-1982.