In Re the Claims of Di Martino

449 N.E.2d 1267, 59 N.Y.2d 638, 463 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3042
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1983·Published·Cited by 32 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, in each of these cases.

Whether the relationships of the bundle-haulers and the motor route carriers with the publishers are those of employees or independent contractors involves resolution of questions of fact. We agree with the Appellate Division that in each case, taken as a whole the proof in the record constituted substantial evidence sustaining the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that the relationship was that of employer-employee.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-. ler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Claims of Di Martino, 449 N.E.2d 1267, 59 N.Y.2d 638, 463 N.Y.S.2d 189, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3042 (N.Y. 1983).

449 N.E.2d 1267 (In Re the Claims of Di Martino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Yoga Vida NYC, Inc. v. Commissioner of Labor
64 N.E.3d 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
In re the Claim of Isaacs
125 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re the Claim of Wolfman
295 A.D.2d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Erny v. Distribution Systems of America, Inc.
283 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Lane v. Lyons
277 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Mason v. Spendiff
238 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re Troy Publishing Company, Inc.
228 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Lazo v. Mak's Trading Co.
644 N.E.2d 1350 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
In re the Claims of Sweeney
191 A.D.2d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Caballero
184 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Klingsberg
178 A.D.2d 711 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Davila
168 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re the Claim of Robinson
141 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Casey
140 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Myers
136 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Gray
134 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
In re the Claim of Martin
512 N.E.2d 310 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
In re the Claim of Rivera
504 N.E.2d 381 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
In re the Claim of Buiza
122 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)