In re the Claim of Martin

512 N.E.2d 310, 70 N.Y.2d 679, 518 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17326
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 512 N.E.2d 310 (In re the Claim of Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Martin, 512 N.E.2d 310, 70 N.Y.2d 679, 518 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17326 (N.Y. 1987).

Opinion

[681]*681OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Appellate Division order should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to that court with direction to remand to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings in accordance with Matter of Field Delivery Serv. (Roberts) (66 NY2d 516) and this memorandum.

In Field Delivery this court held that: "absent an explanation by the agency, an administrative agency decision which, on essentially the same facts as underlaid a prior agency determination, reaches a conclusion contrary to the prior determination is arbitrary and capricious” (id., at 518 [emphasis added]). Here, the Board failed to distinguish or explain its departure from its prior determination in Matter of Di Martino (Buffalo Courier Express Co. — Ross) (59 NY2d 638), a case in which the Board found an employer-employee relationship on essentially the same facts as presented by this case. Therefore, its determination is arbitrary and capricious and should have been annulled by the Appellate Division on appeal. The Appellate Division’s after-the-fact rationalization of the Board’s determination does not satisfy the requirements of Field Delivery.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, with directions to remand to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kopyt v. Governor's Office of Employee Relations
55 A.D.3d 1179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Claim of Horton v. Salt
34 A.D.3d 1052 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Klein v. Levin
305 A.D.2d 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Claim of Maxwell
305 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 1000 v. Angello
277 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Collins v. Governor's Office of Employee Relations
211 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Gaffney v. New York State Department of Education
210 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
New York State Inspection, Security & Law Enforcement Employees v. Kinsella
197 A.D.2d 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Long v. perales
172 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re Claim of Autotte
172 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Matter of Lafayette Storage & Moving Corp.
567 N.E.2d 240 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Claim of Caldas v. 86 Alda Restaurant, Inc.
167 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Engel v. Sobol
161 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Dental Society v. New York State Tax Commission
148 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
New York City Transit Authority v. White
144 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Le Porte
142 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Casey
140 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re the Claim of Myers
136 A.D.2d 787 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 N.E.2d 310, 70 N.Y.2d 679, 518 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 17326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-martin-ny-1987.