In re the Claim of Zegarelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Zegarelli

241 A.D.2d 616, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 3, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 616 (In re the Claim of Zegarelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Zegarelli, 241 A.D.2d 616, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 22, 1996, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was suspended from his employment as a police officer as a result of being convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant’s criminal conviction constitutes disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Cerasuolo [New York City Dept. of Correction—Hudacs], 205 AD2d 827; Matter of Rose [New York City Dept. of Social Servs.—Hudacs], 190 AD2d 926) and that the recoverable overpayment was properly assessed (see, Labor Law § 597 [3], [4]). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 22, 1996, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was suspended from his employment as a police officer as a result of being convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant’s criminal conviction constitutes disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Cerasuolo [New York City Dept. of Correction—Hudacs], 205 AD2d 827; Matter of Rose [New York City Dept. of Social Servs.—Hudacs], 190 AD2d 926) and that the recoverable overpayment was properly assessed (see, Labor Law § 597 [3], [4]). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 616, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-zegarelli-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack