In re the Claim of Cerasuolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Cerasuolo

205 A.D.2d 827, 612 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5822

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 827 (In re the Claim of Cerasuolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Cerasuolo, 205 A.D.2d 827, 612 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The Board found that claimant, a probationary correction officer, lost his employment because of his arrest for drunk driving. In so doing the Board determined that, even accepting claimant’s allegations that he was an alcoholic, claimant was aware or should have been aware of the fact that his actions at the time were dangerous and unlawful. Under the circumstances, the Board concluded that claimant was guilty of misconduct. Insofar as we find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying conditions, its determination must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 31, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The Board found that claimant, a probationary correction officer, lost his employment because of his arrest for drunk driving. In so doing the Board determined that, even accepting claimant’s allegations that he was an alcoholic, claimant was aware or should have been aware of the fact that his actions at the time were dangerous and unlawful. Under the circumstances, the Board concluded that claimant was guilty of misconduct. Insofar as we find substantial evidence in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying conditions, its determination must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 827, 612 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-cerasuolo-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack