In Re Schwartz

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Schwartz

977 A.2d 345, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 2044252

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 16, 2009

Docket09-BG-435

StatusPublished

This text of 977 A.2d 345 (In Re Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Schwartz, 977 A.2d 345, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 2044252 (D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent, see Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Schwartz, 408 Md. 34, 968 A.2d 139 (2009), this court’s May 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and Bar Counsel’s June 29, 2009, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline recommending disbarment as identical reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has filed no response or opposition to the recommendation, it is

ORDERED that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *346 See In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C. 1990) (en banc). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, this disbarment will not commence until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent, see Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Schwartz, 408 Md. 34, 968 A.2d 139 (2009), this court’s May 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and Bar Counsel’s June 29, 2009, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline recommending disbarment as identical reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has filed no response or opposition to the recommendation, it is

ORDERED that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *346 See In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C. 1990) (en banc). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, this disbarment will not commence until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

977 A.2d 345, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 2044252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-schwartz-dc-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack