In Re Schwartz

977 A.2d 345, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 2044252
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided July 16, 2009·No. 09-BG-435·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified copy of the order issued by the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent, see Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Schwartz, 408 Md. 34, 968 A.2d 139 (2009), this court’s May 18, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending final disposition by this court, and Bar Counsel’s June 29, 2009, Statement Regarding Reciprocal Discipline recommending disbarment as identical reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has filed no response or opposition to the recommendation, it is

ORDERED that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *346 See In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C. 1990) (en banc). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that, for purposes of reinstatement, this disbarment will not commence until such time as respondent files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Schwartz, 977 A.2d 345, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 254, 2009 WL 2044252 (D.C. 2009).

977 A.2d 345 (In Re Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Addams
579 A.2d 190 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1990)
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Schwartz
968 A.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz
968 A.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)