Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Schwartz

968 A.2d 139
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 23, 2009
DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 61 September Term, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 968 A.2d 139 (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Schwartz, 968 A.2d 139 (Md. 2009).

Opinion

968 A.2d 139 (2009)

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Bradley David SCHWARTZ, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 61 September Term, 2008.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 23, 2009.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23th day of March, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bradley David Schwartz from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Schwartz
977 A.2d 345 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Mayor of Baltimore v. East Oliver Street Ltd. Partnership
968 A.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
968 A.2d 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-of-maryland-v-schwartz-md-2009.