Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz

968 A.2d 139, 408 Md. 34, 2009 Md. LEXIS 35

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 23, 2009·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 61·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23th day of March, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bradley David Schwartz from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23th day of March, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bradley David Schwartz from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz, 968 A.2d 139, 408 Md. 34, 2009 Md. LEXIS 35 (Md. 2009).

Pincite

968 A.2d 139 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related