Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz

968 A.2d 139, 408 Md. 34, 2009 Md. LEXIS 35
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 23, 2009
DocketMisc. Docket AG, No. 61
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 968 A.2d 139 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Schwartz, 968 A.2d 139, 408 Md. 34, 2009 Md. LEXIS 35 (Md. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 23th day of March, 2009,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Bradley David Schwartz is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Bradley David Schwartz from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Asset Finance, LLC v. Trustees of the Client Protection Fund
86 A.3d 73 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2014)
In Re Schwartz
977 A.2d 345 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
968 A.2d 139, 408 Md. 34, 2009 Md. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-schwartz-md-2009.