In re Scharf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Scharf

70 A.D.2d 915, 417 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12507

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 915 (In re Scharf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Scharf, 70 A.D.2d 915, 417 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to quash subpoenas duces tecum, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 17, 1978, which denied their application. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision reducing the scope of the subpoenaed materials to include only the books and records sought for the years 1976, 1977 and 1978. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The subpoena was overbroad to the extent indicated (see United States v Dionisio, 410 US 1, 11-12; Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v Walling, 327 US 186, 208; Hale v Henkel, 201 US 43, 76-77). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to quash subpoenas duces tecum, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 17, 1978, which denied their application. Order modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision reducing the scope of the subpoenaed materials to include only the books and records sought for the years 1976, 1977 and 1978. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The subpoena was overbroad to the extent indicated (see United States v Dionisio, 410 US 1, 11-12; Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v Walling, 327 US 186, 208; Hale v Henkel, 201 US 43, 76-77). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 915, 417 N.Y.S.2d 877, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-scharf-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack