In re R.A.

982 N.E.2d 683, 134 Ohio St. 3d 350

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2012·No. No. 2011-1182·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309, 2012-Ohio-4538, 978 N.E.2d 164.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re R.A., 982 N.E.2d 683, 134 Ohio St. 3d 350 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

982 N.E.2d 683 (In re R.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.