In re R.A.
This text of 2012 Ohio 5500 (In re R.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re R.A., 134 Ohio St.3d 350, 2012-Ohio-5500.]
IN RE R.A. [Cite as In re R.A., 134 Ohio St.3d 350, 2012-Ohio-5500.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of In re M.W. (No. 2011-1182—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-100635. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309, 2012-Ohio-4538, 978 N.E.2d 164. O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. __________________ Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sheryl A. Trzaska, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ra-ohio-2012.