In re R.A.

2012 Ohio 5500
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re R.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Ohio St. 3d 350
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2012·No. 2011-1182·Published

Opinion

[Cite as In re R.A., 134 Ohio St.3d 350, 2012-Ohio-5500.]

IN RE R.A. [Cite as In re R.A., 134 Ohio St.3d 350, 2012-Ohio-5500.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of In re M.W. (No. 2011-1182—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-100635. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309, 2012-Ohio-4538, 978 N.E.2d 164. O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. __________________ Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Paula Adams, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sheryl A. Trzaska, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re R.A., 2012 Ohio 5500 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 5500 (In re R.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re M.W.
2012 Ohio 4538 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
In re R.A.
982 N.E.2d 683 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)