In Re Proposed Amendments to Administrative Order No. 10

2022 Ark. 92
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedApril 14, 2022
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 Ark. 92 (In Re Proposed Amendments to Administrative Order No. 10) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Proposed Amendments to Administrative Order No. 10, 2022 Ark. 92 (Ark. 2022).

Opinion

Cite as 2022 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered: April 14, 2022

IN RE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 10

PER CURIAM

The Supreme Court Committee on Child Support has proposed changes to Administrative

Order No. 10 and the Affidavit of Financial Means.

The Court extends its sincere gratitude to the members of the Child Support Committee

for their work. These proposals are being published for comment, and the period shall end May 12,

2022.

Comments should be submitted in writing to: Clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court,

Attention: Child Support Committee, Justice Building, 625 Marshall Street, Little Rock, Arkansas

72201.

Administrative Order No. 10 – Child Support Guidelines

Section I. Authority and Scope

Pursuant to Act 948 of 1989, as amended, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312(a) and the Family Support Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100-485 (1988), the Court adopted and published Administrative Order Number 10, titled “Child Support Guidelines” (“Guidelines”). Pursuant to Act 907 of 2019, codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-312(a)(4), the attached revised monthly “Family Support Chart” (“Chart”) is based on an Income Shares Model. The attached Chart therefore, supersedes any prior payor-income-based family support chart. (Section II.1 discusses when this Administrative Order’s incorporation of the Income Shares Model affects existing child- support orders.) This Administrative Order includes and incorporates by reference the “Forms”

Addendum: Sample Calculation, Sample Language for Child-Support Orders, Family Support Chart, Child Support Worksheet (“Worksheet”), and the revised Affidavit of Financial Means. These Guidelines are based on the Income Shares Model, developed by the Child Support Guidelines Project of the National Center for State Courts. The Income Shares Model is based on the concept that children should receive the same proportion of parental income that they would have received had the parents lived together and shared financial resources. The best available economic data on child-rearing expenditures was used to develop the model. A more detailed explanation of the Income Shares Model and the underlying economic evidence used to support it is contained in Development of Guidelines for Child Support Orders, Report to the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement, September 1987 (National Center for State Courts, Denver, Colorado). The September 2019 Review of the Arkansas Child Support Guidelines, an Analysis of Economic Data, Development of Income Shares Charts, and Other Considerations, prepared by Jane Venohr, Ph.D., is available at www.arcourts.gov/forms-and-publications/arkansas-child- support-guidelines.

Under the revised Family Support Chart, each parent’s share is that parent’s prorated share of the two parents’ combined income. The Chart reflects the average amount of money that families in the United States spend on their children. Differences between Arkansas prices and prices across the United States more generally have been accounted for using an index that the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) developed. The Chart also considers and accounts for:

• federal and state income taxes and FICA; • average child-rearing expenditures using current measurements developed by Professor David Betson using the Rothbarth methodology to separate the children’s share of expenditures from total expenditures; • out-of-pocket medical expenses of $250.00 per child per year.

The Chart excludes parental expenditures for work-related childcare, the child’s share of health insurance premiums, and out-of-pocket medical expenses over $250.00 per child per year.

These Guidelines and the accompanying Worksheet assume that the parent to whom support is owed (payee parent) is spending his or her calculated share directly on the child. For the parent with the obligation to pay support (payor parent), the pro-rata charted amount establishes the base level of child support to be given to the payee parent. The base amount may, however, be adjusted to account for work-related childcare expenditures, the child’s share of the health insurance premium, out-of-pocket medical expenses exceeding $250.00 per child per year, the self- support reserve, or other factors a court determines to be in the best interest of a child or children.

Section II. Use of the Guidelines

There is a rebuttable presumption that the amount of child support calculated pursuant to the most recent revision of the Family Support Chart and these Guidelines is the amount to be awarded in any judicial proceeding for divorce, separation, paternity, guardianship, or child support.

In addition to an initial award for child support or the modification of an existing obligation, these Guidelines should be used to assess the adequacy of agreements for child support and to encourage parties to settle support-related disputes in a comprehensive manner.

These Guidelines provide calculated amounts of child support for a combined parental gross income of up to $30,000.00 per month, or $360,000.00 per year. The child-support 2 obligation for incomes above $30,000.00 per month shall be determined by using the highest amount in these Guidelines. The court may then use its discretion in setting an amount above that to meet the needs of the child and the parent’s ability to provide support.

These Guidelines assume that the payor parent has the minor child(ren) overnight in his or her residence less than 141 overnights per calendar year.1

1. Modification of Existing Child-Support Obligation:

Pursuant to Act 904 of 2019, codified at Arkansas Code Annotated § 9-14-107(c)(2), “an inconsistency between the existing child-support award and the amount of child support that results from application of the Family Support Chart shall constitute a material change of circumstances sufficient to petition the court for modification of child support according to the Family Support Chart after appropriate deductions unless:

a. The inconsistency does not meet a reasonable quantitative standard established by the State of Arkansas in accordance with subsection (a) of this section; b. The inconsistency is due to the fact that the amount of the current child support award resulted from a rebuttal of the guideline amount and there has not been a change of circumstances that resulted in the rebuttal of the guidelines amount; or c. The inconsistency is due solely to a promulgation to a revision of the Family Support Chart.” 2

2. Deviation from the Chart:

All orders granting or modifying child support shall contain the court’s determination of the payor’s income, payee’s income, recite the amount of support required under these Guidelines, and state whether the court deviated from the presumptive child-support calculation set by the Worksheet and these Guidelines. If an order deviates from the Guidelines amount, then the order must explain the reason(s) for the deviation. When deciding whether the Worksheet-based amount is unjust or inappropriate, the court must consider all the relevant factors, including what is in the child’s or children’s best interest. A deviation from these Guidelines should be the exception rather than the rule. If a court chooses to deviate from the Guidelines amount, th en it must make written findings and explain the deviation. It shall be sufficient in a particular case to rebut the presumption that the amount of child support calculated pursuant to the Worksheet is correct if the court provides in the order a specific written finding that the Worksheet-based amount is unjust or inappropriate. When determining whether to deviate from the Guidelines’ amount, a court should consider the following:

a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Proposed Amendments to Administrative Order No. 10
2022 Ark. 92 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 Ark. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-proposed-amendments-to-administrative-order-no-10-ark-2022.