In re Pleto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pleto

98 A.D.2d 994, 470 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21353

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1983·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Except in the most compelling circumstances, which are not present in this case, the parties to a matrimonial action should not waste their assets and court’s time seeking review of an order of temporary alimony (see Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450, 453). A prompt trial is the most effective means to resolve any claimed inequities in temporary alimony awards (see Chernofsky v Chernofsky, 90 AD2d 765; Hahn v Hahn, 65 AD2d 782; Steinfink v Steinfink, 65 AD2d 621). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J. — temporary maintenance and child support.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green,

O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Except in the most compelling circumstances, which are not present in this case, the parties to a matrimonial action should not waste their assets and court’s time seeking review of an order of temporary alimony (see Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450, 453). A prompt trial is the most effective means to resolve any claimed inequities in temporary alimony awards (see Chernofsky v Chernofsky, 90 AD2d 765; Hahn v Hahn, 65 AD2d 782; Steinfink v Steinfink, 65 AD2d 621). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cook, J. — temporary maintenance and child support.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green,

O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

In re Pleto, 98 A.D.2d 994, 470 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

98 A.D.2d 994 (In re Pleto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related