Steinfink v. Steinfink

65 A.D.2d 621, 409 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13317
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1978·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 13, 1978, which, inter alia, awarded the defendant wife temporary alimony, custody of the parties’ children and use of a Dodge Aspen automobile. The defendant purports to cross-appeal from certain portions of the same order. Cross appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Howe Ave. Nursing Home v Nafus, 54 AD2d 686, 687). Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. "A speedy trial is the most effective remedy to cure any seeming inequity in a pendente lite award” (Lemme v Lemme, 63 AD2d 695). To insure that a speedy trial is had, the parties are directed to expeditiously complete all pretrial disclosure proceedings. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, Hawkins and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinfink v. Steinfink, 65 A.D.2d 621, 409 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

65 A.D.2d 621 (Steinfink v. Steinfink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Pleto
98 A.D.2d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Iacobacci v. Iacobacci
84 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Catucci v. Catucci
73 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
69 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)