In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

Second Circuit

In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

204 F. 259, 124 C.C.A. 347, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1280

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1913

DocketNo. 206

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 F. 259 (In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 204 F. 259, 124 C.C.A. 347, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1280 (2d Cir. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two motious have been made: One, to dismiss an appeal; the other, for a mandamus.

As to the motion to dismiss, we think that the injunction order appealed from disposes of appellant’s right (assuming that he has rights) with such absolute finality that it may, as to him, be considered a final decision within the meaning of the statute. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Since the claimant in the other application may obtain relief by appeal, it is not necessary to consider the further questions presented by his application for mandamus.

The appeal may be set for argument on the 17th of February.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI