In re Agwi Nav. Co.

17 F. Supp. 973, 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1709
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 18, 1936·Published

Opinion

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a petition to file a claim nunc pro tunc in the Morro Castle proceedings. Objection is made on the ground that the statute of limitations, 46 U.S.C.A. § 763, has run, extinguishing the right. The pendency of the limitation proceedings did not suspend the running of the statute. Petition of Clinchfield Nav. Co. (The Northwestern) (D.C.) 26 F.(2d) 290; Kavanagh v. Folsom (C.C.) 181 F. 401; In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Company (C.C.A.) 204 F. 260; Williams v. Quebec S. S. Co., Ltd. (D.C.) 126 F. 591; The Princess Sophia (D.C.) 35 F.(2d) 736, 739, 1930 A.M.C. 468, 473, affirmed (C.C.A.) 61 F.(2d) 339, 1932 A.M.C. 1562, 1592. Hence the statute is effective, the right is extinguished, and the claim may not be filed. The Harrisburg, 119 U.S. 199, 214, 7 S.Ct. 140, 30 L.Ed. 358; Western Fuel Company v. Garcia, 257 U.S. 233, 42 S.Ct. 89, 66 L.Ed. 210.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Agwi Nav. Co., 17 F. Supp. 973, 1936 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1709 (S.D.N.Y. 1936).

17 F. Supp. 973 (In re Agwi Nav. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Harrisburg
119 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia
257 U.S. 233 (Supreme Court, 1921)
In re Clinchfield Nav. Co.
26 F.2d 290 (S.D. New York, 1928)
The Princess Sophia
35 F.2d 736 (W.D. Washington, 1929)
Williams v. Quebec S. S. Co.
126 F. 591 (S.D. New York, 1903)
Kavanagh v. Folsom
181 F. 401 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1910)
In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.
204 F. 260 (Second Circuit, 1913)