In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.

204 F. 259, 124 C.C.A. 347, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1280
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 11, 1913·No. No. 206·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two motious have been made: One, to dismiss an appeal; the other, for a mandamus.

As to the motion to dismiss, we think that the injunction order appealed from disposes of appellant’s right (assuming that he has rights) with such absolute finality that it may, as to him, be considered a final decision within the meaning of the statute. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Since the claimant in the other application may obtain relief by appeal, it is not necessary to consider the further questions presented by his application for mandamus.

The appeal may be set for argument on the 17th of February.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co., 204 F. 259, 124 C.C.A. 347, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1280 (2d Cir. 1913).

204 F. 259 (In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related