In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.
This text of In Re: Nuvasive, Inc. (In Re: Nuvasive, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: NUVASIVE, INC., Appellant ______________________
2015-1842, 2015-1843 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00081, IPR2014-00087. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by ANDREW SWANSON BROWN, SONJA ROCHELLE GERRARD; GRACE J. PAK, PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los Angeles, CA; RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC.
SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Nuvasive, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-nuvasive-inc-cafc-2017.