FEDERAL · 35 U.S.C. · Chapter 31

Inter partes review

35 U.S.C. § 311
Title35Patents
Chapter31 — INTER PARTES REVIEW

This text of 35 U.S.C. § 311 (Inter partes review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
35 U.S.C. § 311.

Text

(a)In General.—Subject to the provisions of this chapter, a person who is not the owner of a patent may file with the Office a petition to institute an inter partes review of the patent. The Director shall establish, by regulation, fees to be paid by the person requesting the review, in such amounts as the Director determines to be reasonable, considering the aggregate costs of the review.
(b)Scope.—A petitioner in an inter partes review may request to cancel as unpatentable 1 or more claims of a patent only on a ground that could be raised under section 102 or 103 and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications.
(c)Filing Deadline.—A petition for inter partes review shall be filed after the later of either—
(1)the date that is 9 months after the grant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
131 S. Ct. 2238 (Supreme Court, 2011)
811 case citations
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
721 F.3d 1330 (Federal Circuit, 2013)
126 case citations
Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services
859 F.3d 1044 (Federal Circuit, 2017)
92 case citations
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC
584 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 2018)
92 case citations
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
878 F.3d 1364 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
35 case citations
Straight Path Ip Group, Inc. v. Sipnet Eu S.R.O.
806 F.3d 1356 (Federal Circuit, 2015)
27 case citations
Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Iancu
952 F.3d 1346 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
18 case citations
Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.
897 F.3d 1336 (Federal Circuit, 2018)
16 case citations
ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC
914 F.3d 1054 (Seventh Circuit, 2019)
14 case citations
Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. v. Athena Automation Ltd.
838 F.3d 1236 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
13 case citations
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corporation
946 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 2020)
9 case citations
Zachary Silbersher v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Int'l
89 F.4th 1154 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)
9 case citations
Trs. of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y. v. Symantec Corp.
390 F. Supp. 3d 665 (E.D. Virginia, 2019)
4 case citations
Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
983 F. Supp. 2d 713 (E.D. Virginia, 2014)
2 case citations
Paice LLC v. Ford Motor Company
(Federal Circuit, 2018)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–567; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(a)(1), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 299; Pub. L. 112–274, §1(d)(2), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2456.)

Editorial Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2013—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–274 struck out "or issuance of a reissue of a patent" after "grant of a patent".
2011—Pub. L. 112–29 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to request for inter partes reexamination.
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(a)(1)(A), substituted "third-party requester" for "person".
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §13202(a)(1)(B), substituted "The" for "Unless the requesting person is the owner of the patent, the".

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2013 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–274 effective Jan. 14, 2013, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after such date, see section 1(n) of Pub. L. 112–274, set out as a note under section 5 of this title.

Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(c)(2), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304, provided that:
"(A) In general.—The amendments made by subsection (a) [enacting section 319 of this title and amending this section and sections 312 to 318 of this title] shall take effect upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date.
"(B) Graduated implementation.—The Director [Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office] may impose a limit on the number of inter partes reviews that may be instituted under chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, during each of the first 4 1-year periods in which the amendments made by subsection (a) are in effect, if such number in each year equals or exceeds the number of inter partes reexaminations that are ordered under chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, in the last fiscal year ending before the effective date of the amendments made by subsection (a)."

Effective Date
Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.

Regulations
Pub. L. 112–29, §6(c)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304, provided that: "The Director [Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office] shall, not later than the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011], issue regulations to carry out chapter 31 of title 35, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section."

Applicability of Filing Deadline
Pub. L. 112–274, §1(d)(1), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2456, provided that: "Section 311(c) of title 35, United States Code, shall not apply to a petition to institute an inter partes review of a patent that is not a patent described in section 3(n)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act [Pub. L. 112–29] (35 U.S.C. 100 note)."

Report to Congress
Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, subtitle F, §4606], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–571, required the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to submit to Congress a report on possible inequities of certain inter partes reexamination proceedings no later than 5 years after Nov. 29, 1999.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 U.S.C. § 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/35/311.