In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty

43 A.3d 464, 615 Pa. 425

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 2, 2012·No. 25 WAP 2011, 26 WAP 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

[426] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby DISMISSED as moot.

Chief Justice CASTILLE files a dissenting statement joined by Justices BAER and McCAFFERY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty, 43 A.3d 464, 615 Pa. 425 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

43 A.3d 464 (In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.