In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty
20 A.3d 1186, 610 Pa. 409, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1161
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 20, 2011·No. 209 WAL 2011, 210 WAL 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of May 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
(1) Did the Commonwealth Court err when it permitted [candidate] to amend his nomination petition to correct a fatal defect in certain of the circulators’ affidavits that *410 were notarized without the circulators personally appearing before the notary in violation of the law and the public trust?
(2) Did the Commonwealth Court err by permitting [candidate] to amend his nomination petition because the invalid circulators’ affidavits were a fatal defect not apparent on the face and thus, not amendable under the Election Code?
The case will be submitted on the briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty, 20 A.3d 1186, 610 Pa. 409, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1161 (Pa. 2011).
20 A.3d 1186 (In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Nomination Petition of Valenty
43 A.3d 464 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)