In Re Nomination Paper of Rogers

907 A.2d 503, 589 Pa. 86, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1892
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 2006·No. Appeal 108 MAP 2006·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

[87]*87 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby AFFIRMED. This order is entered without prejudice to the Appellant to seek review of the pending Order of the Commonwealth Court imposing a final order of costs. In Re Nomination Paper of Ralph Nader, 905 A.2d 450, 457 (2006). We further direct that the Commonwealth Court’s final order assessing costs reference by category and amount assessed as well as a statement of rationale behind the imposition of these costs.

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Nomination Paper of Rogers, 907 A.2d 503, 589 Pa. 86, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1892 (Pa. 2006).

907 A.2d 503 (In Re Nomination Paper of Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Nomination Petition of Payton
945 A.2d 279 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
In Re Nomination Paper of Rogers
942 A.2d 915 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
In Re Nomination Paper of Rogers
907 A.2d 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)