In re M.M.
This text of 2009 Ohio 4048 (In re M.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re M.M., 122 Ohio St.3d 541, 2009-Ohio-4048.]
IN RE M.M. [Cite as In re M.M., 122 Ohio St.3d 541, 2009-Ohio-4048.] Certified question answered in the negative and judgment of the court of appeals affirmed on the authority of In re Schaefer. (Nos. 2009-0090 and 2009-0318 — Submitted July 14, 2009 — Decided August 18, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, Nos. 22872 and 22873, 2008-Ohio-6236. __________________ {¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re Schaefer, 111 Ohio St.3d 498, 2006-Ohio-5513, 857 N.E.2d 532. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Richard A. F. Lipowicz, for appellant Jessica Lairson. Flanagan, Lieberman, Hoffman & Swaim and Richard Hempfling, for appellant Kathy Richards. Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Johnna M. Shia, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee, Montgomery County Children Services. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 4048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-mm-ohio-2009.