In Re: Mills v.

294 F. App'x 55

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Edward Mills petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that, by order entered on August 26, 2008, the district court granted Mills’ § 3582(c)(2) motion as to two counts of conviction. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Mills’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.